Volume 9, Issue 4, August 2020, Page: 286-289
Nursing Intervention of Nonstop Minimally Invasive Tricuspid Valve Forming with Simultaneous Atrial Flutter After Secondary Cardiac Surgery: A Case Report
Zhilian Huang, The Operating Room, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Yuxiu Qian, The Operating Room, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Lihuan Hou, The Operating Room, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Xiaoshen Zhang, Department of Cardiac Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Chengfeng Huang, Department of Cardiac Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Hailing Huang, Plastic Surgery Department, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Received: Jul. 6, 2020;       Accepted: Jul. 17, 2020;       Published: Jul. 28, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajns.20200904.30      View  87      Downloads  40
Abstract
We discuss the nursing intervention of nonstop minimally invasive tricuspid valve forming with simultaneous atrial flutter after secondary cardiac surgery. Patient is a 50-years-old male who undergoing repair of atrial septal defect by central thoracotomy with extracorporeal circulation as atrial septal defect in the 30 years ago require repair of atrial septal defect by central thoracotomy with extracorporeal circulation again as residual shunt after repair. In patient checking report of January 2019, it indicated that in the case of no obvious inducement patients appear palpitation, palpitation, is persistent. Base on admission dynamic electrocardiogram, it indicated: (1) Persistent atrial flutter (2) second degree atrioventricular block with junctional escape (3) severe tricuspid regurgitation. In result of operation, we successfully completed the operation, and the patient had no complications after the operation. The surgical procedure was to perform electrophysiological mapping of the right atrium, establish extracorporeal circulation, surgical bipolar radiofrequency ablation, and tricuspid valve formation. Base on result of this operation, effective implementation of prospective nursing interventions can reduce the risk of surgery. In addition, in operation process, as the operation involves a large number of instruments and equipment and surgical personnel, the position of equipment and the rationality of personnel station will influence the result of operation.
Keywords
Cardiac Surgery, Nursing, Surgery
To cite this article
Zhilian Huang, Yuxiu Qian, Lihuan Hou, Xiaoshen Zhang, Chengfeng Huang, Hailing Huang, Nursing Intervention of Nonstop Minimally Invasive Tricuspid Valve Forming with Simultaneous Atrial Flutter After Secondary Cardiac Surgery: A Case Report, American Journal of Nursing Science. Vol. 9, No. 4, 2020, pp. 286-289. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20200904.30
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018; 137: e67-e492.
[2]
Tang H, Shrager JB. The Signaling Network Resulting in Ventilator-induced Diaphragm Dysfunction. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2018; 59: 417-427.
[3]
Lerolle N, Guerot E, Dimassi S, et al. Ultrasonographic diagnostic criterion for severe diaphragmatic dysfunction after cardiac surgery. Chest. 2019; 135: 401-407.
[4]
Ren YP, Xie Q, LU CQ, Ou-Yang SY, Chen JM, DENG CY. Intraoperative risk and nursing of reoperation of heart. Ling Nan Journal of Cardiovascular Disease, 2018; 3 (24): 230-231.
[5]
Zambon M, Greco M, Bocchino S, et al.: Assessment of diaphragmatic dysfunction in the critically ill patient with ultrasound: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2017; 43: 29-38.
[6]
Liu J, Zhang XS, Guo HM, Liu J, et al. Complete thoracoscopic tricuspid valve replacement in 1 case. Chinese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2016; 30 (6): 379.
[7]
Moury PH, Cuisinier A, Durand M, et al. Diaphragm thickening in cardiac surgery: a perioperative prospective ultrasound study. Ann Intensive Care. 2019; 9: 50.
[8]
D’Agostino RS, Jacobs JP, Badhwar V, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database: 2019 update on outcomes and quality. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 107: 24–23.
[9]
Landoni G, Lomivorotov V, Silvetti S, et al. Nonsurgical strategies to reduce mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: An updated consensus process. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32: 225–235.
[10]
Lazam S, Vanoverschelde J-L, Tribouilloy C, et al. Twenty-year outcome after mitral repair versus replacement for severe degenerative mitral regurgitation. Analysis of a large, prospective, multicenter international registry. Circulation. 2017; 135: 410–422.
[11]
Pieri M, Belletti A, Monaco F, et al. Outcome of cardiac surgery in patients with low preoperative ejection fraction. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016; 16: 97.
[12]
Motohiro SK, Okada, H, Funaoka, S, Sato, T, Ichinomiya, Ushio Higashijima, S, Matsumoto, O, Yoshitomi, K, Eishi, TH. Association between Enterocyte Injury and Mortality in Patients on Hemodialysis Who Underwent Cardiac Surgery: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Surgical Research. 2020; 255.
[13]
Pianpian Y, Xijie W, Feifei C, Yongcong C, Yiting H, Gang L, Keke L. Efficacy and safety of sugammadex in anesthesia of cardiac surgery: A retrospective study. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2020; 65.
Browse journals by subject